Food Recipe Ingredient Substitution ODP Pattern¶

Source: ODP portal · Published by: semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl · Category: information · Domain: food-science

Which recipe does a given ingredient substitution apply to, and does the substitution change the ingredient list, the preparation steps, or both?; What requirement does a given ingredient substitution have to satisfy - a diet, a cultural restriction, or a limit on how the food can be prepared - and what is the substitution meant to achieve?; How much of which food does a recipe call for, and which qualities of that food are recorded: how it tastes, how it fits a diet, or how it behaves when cooked?

What it answers¶

Which recipe does a given ingredient substitution apply to, and does the substitution change the ingredient list, the preparation steps, or both?
What requirement does a given ingredient substitution have to satisfy - a diet, a cultural restriction, or a limit on how the food can be prepared - and what is the substitution meant to achieve?
How much of which food does a recipe call for, and which qualities of that food are recorded: how it tastes, how it fits a diet, or how it behaves when cooked?

The pattern¶

The graph is the axioms the pattern asserts; nothing here is inferred. Drag to rearrange, scroll to zoom, and use the graph's own search box to find a term inside it.

Opens at level of detail 3: classes, individuals, properties and restrictions, without the literals. Raise it with the LOD control in the graph's own toolbar to see annotation values and anything a reasoner adds.

Download the pattern

Should you use this one?¶


Size	24 classes, 8 properties, 61 axioms
Brings in	1 imported ontology, so adopting it adopts that too
Reasoning	HermiT finds this pattern consistent, with no unsatisfiable class, and its worked example consistent with the pattern.

Check it yourself: the published pattern · an archived copy · the ontology itself.

If a link does not open

ontologydesignpatterns.org, which publishes most of this library, does not currently answer over HTTPS, and its wiki redirects submission pages to its front page. The archived copy is there for exactly that reason. The ontology files themselves are still served over plain HTTP.

Terms it declares¶

The 32 classes and properties this pattern models, as the recommender scores them. Annotation properties and built-ins are excluded, because an annotation property is not modelling.

http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#action_specification
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#condition
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#cultural_condition
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#data_item
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#data_set
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#dietary_condition
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#dietary_quality
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#food_item
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#food_recipe
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#food_recipe_ingredient_substitution_(specification)
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#has_component
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#has_member
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#has_part
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#has_quality
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#has_quantity
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#has_unit
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#ingredient_set_(specification)
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#ingredient_set_transformation_specification
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#ingredient_specification
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#instruction_set_(specification)
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#instruction_set_transformation_specification
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#is_about
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#is_quality_measure_of
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#objective
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#objective_specification
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#plan_specification
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#proposition
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#quality
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#step_specification
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#tastiness_quality
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#technological_condition
http://semantic.cs.put.poznan.pl/ontologies/food_ingredient_substitutes#technological_quality

An example of it in use¶

The pattern says what may be asserted; this says it. The graph below is a small set of individuals that instantiate the classes above and are connected by its properties, so the shape the pattern describes is visible as data rather than as a schema.

Download the example

Import this pattern into your own ontology from inside Protégé: OntoBoard → Reuse → Pattern library…, which hands it to Import terms… and writes the term list, the module, the import and the catalog entry the way ODK expects. See Working with ODK.

Something wrong with this pattern, its example or this page? Report a problem with this pattern - the form opens with the pattern filled in, and a title and a sentence are all it needs.